© 2026 Della Group. All Rights Reserved.
Okay, so you're eyeing some new Solana memecoin? Before you even think about swapping, hit up rugcheck.xyz and slam that token address into the search bar. Takes like 2 seconds. Why? It spits out a full breakdown on mintability, liquidity traps, and if the dev's holding a fat stack ready to dump. Saved my ass more times than I can count.
In my experience, skipping this is how noobs get rekt. Tokens look shiny on Dexscreener, but Rugcheck flags the shady stuff instantly. Like, is it freezable? Mintable forever? Boom, red flags everywhere.
Look, Solana's pumping out tokens like crazy. One minute it's mooning, next it's rugged. Rugcheck's your bullshit detector. It scans the contract for vulnerabilities, checks liquidity pools for manipulation, and peeks at holder distribution. The thing is, devs can hide nasty functions-like unlimited minting or hidden fees-that let 'em print more tokens and crash the price.
Honestly, I've seen "safe" tokens where top 5 holders control 80%+. Rugcheck calls that out. Why does this matter? 'Cause if whales dump, you're left holding bags. Pretty much every rug starts with low liquidity or sketchy ownership. Use it, or regret it.
That's it for basics. But now, dig deeper. What's next?
Okay, report's up. Mintable: yes? Dev can print infinite supply. Freezable: they freeze your tokens. Mutable metadata? Name/logo changes post rug to confuse you. I usually bail if any of these pop.
Liquidity low-like under 50 SOL? Snipers drain it fast. Top holders over 20% combined? Dump incoming. Sound familiar? Every rug I've dodged had these.
So the page loads with a big score-say, 85/100. Nice, but don't stop. sections.
Contract code: Looks for malicious functions. Unauthorized mint? Hidden admin keys? Rugcheck flags 'em.
Ownership: Revoked? Good. If not, dev controls everything. Liquidity analysis: Pool size, volume spread, wallet concentration. If 90% volume from 3 wallets? Manipulation city.
Holder distribution: Top 10 over 50%? Risky. Creator balance high? They're dumping soon.
And taxes-buy/sell fees. Over 10% sell tax? Honeypot vibes. Can't sell without losing shirt.
In my experience, combine this with Birdeye for real time charts. Rugcheck says safe, but volume dying? Still sketchy.
Fix? Always DYOR. Rugcheck's a tool, not gospel. Pair with Phantom wallet warnings too.
Some tokens have a verified checkmark. Means team applied, got manual review. Experts checked code, revoked ownership, all that jazz. But not all good projects verify-lazy devs skip it. Bad ones? Never get it.
Why chase it? Cuts impersonators. With .token domains, verified ones claim official names. Spot fakes easy.
But here's the kicker: Verification ain't foolproof. Rugcheck still scans verified ones daily for changes.
You trading bots or building? Get the API. Sign up at rugcheck.xyz, verify email, grab from dashboard.
Store it safe-no sharing. For Solana apps, add your private in .env for JWT auth. Headers: X API.
Endpoint like /v1/tokens/{token}/report. Hits back risk level, trust score, warnings. Python example? Super simple.
import requests apikey = 'yourkey_here'
token = 'token_address'
url = f'https://api.rugcheck.xyz/v1/tokens/solana/{token}/report'
headers = {'X API': api_key}
response = requests.get(url, headers=headers)
data = response.json()
print(data['riskLevel']) # LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH
Test with USDC: EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v. Should say low risk, high trust.
Costs? Free tier limited, paid scales. ~0.001 SOL equiv per call? Check dashboard. Integrate into snipers-auto skip rugs.
| Tool | Best For | Solana Focus | Free? | API? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rugcheck.xyz | Memecoins, rugs | Yes, deep scans | Yes | Yes |
| Birdeye | Charts, metadata | Yes | Mostly | Limited |
| Dexscreener | Pool info | Yes | Yes | No |
| De.Fi Scanner | Multi chain | No, EVM main | Partial | Yes |
Rugcheck wins for Solana rugs. Others good backups. Use all three? Overkill, but safe.
Pro tip: Script your own checker with NPM packages like @degenfrends/solana rugchecker. Checks mintable, liquidity burn, top holders. Run thresholds-if top 10 >30%, skip buy.
Manual too slow? Build a script. NPM install that package, call check(token). Returns RugCheckResult.
I usually set rules: liquidity >100 SOL, mint burned, creator <5%, no fees >5%. Greenlight only then.
Issues? Solana RPC lags-use premium like Helius. Gas? Negligible, ~0.000005 SOL per tx view.
Seen bots rug anyway? Yeah, if liquidity burns partial. Set strict: 100% burned.
Solana's Token Extensions add hooks, metadata pointers. Cool, but risky. Rugcheck specializes here-checks configs for exploits.
Example: Permanent delegate? Dev moves your tokens anytime. Interaction patterns weird? Combo risks.
What's next? Always scan extensions flagged tokens twice. Manual Solscan peek too.
Rugcheck's audited themselves. Third party pentests, data integrity locks. Partners with FluxBeam, wallets. Processes thousands daily.
No token of their own-pure tool. That's why I trust it. Not shilling.
Remember that dog coin last month? Rugcheck screamed high risk-mintable, 0.1 SOL liq. Ignored it? Lost 2 SOL. Listened? Saved.
Another: Verified token rugged via extension hack. Rugcheck caught post scan change. Daily monitoring ftw.
But false positives? Yeah, new legit projects flag till verified. Wait or manual check.
Morning: Scan watchlist on Rugcheck.
Before swap: Quick paste.
Portfolio: API poll nightly for changes.
That's my flow. Zero rugs in 6 months. You?
Scale up-wallets integrate it. See warnings pre sign.
Report blank? Token too new or RPC hiccup. Refresh, try Solscan mirror.
Score drops overnight? Liquidity pulled. Sell fast.
API 429? Rate limited. Upgrade plan.
High trust but rugged? Rare, but happens. Devs renounce post scan. Check renounce tx on Solscan.
One more: Fees like 0.3% on some? Normal swaps. But token sell tax 15%? Trap.
You're set now. Go check that token. Tell me if it rugs.
© 2026 Della Group. All Rights Reserved.