Here's the deal: Auditing Solana programs isn't some mystical art-it's a grind you can learn step by step, especially if you're comfy with Rust and Anchor. I've done a bunch of these, and honestly, it's like being a detective for code that handles real money. One slip up, and poof-millions gone, like that $320M Wormhole mess. But you can master it. We'll walk through it practically, from setup to shipping a report that'll make devs sweat.
Solana's blazing fast, right? Transactions zip by at thousands per second, fees hover around 0.000005 SOL per signature. But that speed means exploits hit hard and quick. Programs are Rust based on chain logic, often using Anchor framework for sanity. The thing is, without audits, you're begging for reentrancy, missing signer checks, or account confusion. In my experience, 80% of bugs are dumb stuff like not verifying ownership-accounts have an owner field that screams "hey, is this my program's turf?" Skip it, and attackers drain funds. Sound familiar? You'll spot these fast once you're in the groove.Okay, potential pitfalls upfront: Solana's parallel execution loves DoS via compute limits (max ~1.4M compute units per tx). And PDAs (program derived addresses) are king-mess up seeds, and boom, wrong authority.
sh -c "$(curl -sSfL https://release.solana.com/stable/install)". Testnet deploy? solana config set --url devnet.cargo install --git https://github.com/coral xyz/anchor anchor cli --locked. It's your Rust wrapper-macros like #[account] enforce checks.rustup install 1.75 or whatever's stable. Solana wants specific versions.cargo run -- recap and spits a Markdown overview of instructions, signers, writables. Game changer for triage.Deploy a test program: anchor init mytest && anchor build && anchor deploy. Costs like 0.01 SOL on devnet. Now you're cooking.
Every audit starts here. Grab the repo, whitepaper, IDL (Anchor's JSON interface). Ask: What's this program do? DeFi? NFT mint? List integrations-SPL tokens? External CPIs (cross program invocations)?
And here's a quick table for scoping questions I always hit devs with:| Question | Why It Matters | Red Flags |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose & flows? | Maps expected vs. actual behavior | Vague answers = hidden logic bombs |
| Dependencies? | Spot third party risks | Unpinned SPL versions |
| Admin keys? | Centralization kills | Single upgrade authority |
| Test coverage? | Proves they thought ahead | No fuzz tests |
In my experience, skip this and you're auditing blind. Set goals: No unauthorized access. Data integrity. Asset safety. Document it-takes 30 mins, saves days.
anchor idl parse.Start with instruction handlers. Anchor's #[program] module-each pub fn is an entrypoint. Check signers: #[account(mut, signer)]? Good. Missing? Attacker skips auth.
Common gotchas I hunt:
ctx.accounts.user.issigner. Or use Anchor's initpayer.account.owner == program_id. Helius calls this a top vuln-lets fakes slip in.Pro tip: Use sol azy recap. It pulls #[derive(Accounts)], lists writables without constraints. Writable sans seeds/has_one? Dig deep.
And run through every CPI:invoke(&ix, &accounts)? Validate targets. Short sentences for emphasis: Check seeds. Verify bumps. Zero data on close.
Now tools shine. Static: Scan source without running.
anchor test. Hits unit tests.cargo audit for deps vulns.Dynamic: Deploy to local validator. solana test validator. Tx simulate: solana program deploy --program id keypair target/deploy/program.so.
Edge cases? Pump invalid inputs. Watch compute: Over 1.4M units? DoS city.
anchor test --skip local validator with fuzzer flag.I usually fuzz 10k iterations. Finds overflows quick. Fix? Add require!(amount < u64::MAX / 2, ErrorCode::Overflow).
Okay, time to hack your own code. Ethical, duh. Sim reentrancy: CPI back to self? Set nonce, check state invariants before/after.
Flash loans? Solana's got 'em via Jupiter. Borrow huge, manipulate oracle, repay. Test: Duplicate modes in pools (Halborn found this in Huma-yield calc wrong).
token::ID check.Tool: Custom scripts with @solana/web3.js. Fire 100 txs/sec at devnet. Watch failures.
Permissions first. Role based access? #[account(has_one = authority)]. Admin risks? Multisig better than solo.
Cross off. Miss one? Report screams.
No fluff. Structure: Exec summary, then findings by severity.
Severities like Halborn: Critical (9-10: fund loss), High (7-8.9), etc. Score with CVSS ish: Impact x Likelihood.
Example finding: High: Missing Ownership Check Account passed to transfer, noowner == programid. Attacker swaps fake account, drains 100% funds. Fix: Add require!(account.owner == ctx.programid, ErrorCode::InvalidOwner). List all: Critical first. Then remediations. End with risk summary post fixes.
Devs fix? Retest everything. Re run fuzz, manual. Final deploy sim on testnet.
Issues? Common: They half ass fixes. Force full re audit. In my experience, 2-3 rounds normal.
Follow up: Recommend 6-month re audit or post upgrade. Tools evolve-Anchor updates break stuff.
Master Anchor macros deep. #[account(seeds = [&[b"vault"], authority.().asref()], bump)]? Verifies PDA uniquely. Constraints like constraint = authority.() == ctx.accounts.user.().
Memory: Realloc? Check invariants post resize. Sol azy flags these.
Teams? Two independent reviews, like Vibranium. Cuts blind spots.
And for big leagues: Integration tests. Mock SPL, fire real txs.Potential nightmare: Vanilla Solana (no Anchor). Manual deserialization-anchorlang::AccountDeserialize or bust. Prone to discriminator mismatches.
| Tool | Best For | Cost | Gotcha |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anchor Test | Unit/dynamic | Free | Local only |
| Sol azy | Recon overview | Free | Anchor only |
| Honggfuzz | Fuzzing | Free | Setup time |
| Slab | Static patterns | Free | False positives |
Don't theory this. Audit open repos.
Time per audit? Small program: 20-40 hours. Complex DeFi: 100+. Bill $5k-50k easy once pro.
Stuck? Why overflows? Rust panics on wraparound-use checked_mul. Permissions fuzzy? Trace every writable.