Okay, so most new Solana devs jump straight into coding without checking if accounts are signers. Boom. Instant exploit. Attackers pass in fake accounts, and your program just lets 'em run wild. I did this once early on-lost a whole testnet deploy to some dummy input. Why does this matter? Because Solana's attacker controlled model means anyone can shove whatever into your functions. Fix it by always slapping in ctx.accounts.youraccount.issigner checks right at the top. Honest to god, it saved my ass on every project since.
In my experience, skipping signer checks is like leaving your front door open in a bad neighborhood. And Solana? It's a high traffic hood. Now, let's get you set up properly so you don't repeat this crap.
Look, half the headaches come from a janky setup. I usually start with Rust, 'cause Solana programs live in Rust. Curl this into your terminal:
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh
Then Solana CLI. Grab it with sh -c "$(curl -sSfL https://release.solana.com/stable/install)". Restart your shell. Boom, you're in.
solana keygen newsolana airdrop 2 (up to 24 SOL a day, but don't abuse it)cargo install --git https://github.com/coral xyz/anchor anchor cli --locked. It's like Rust's guardrails for Solana-defines accounts, handles serialization, all that jazz.What's next? Local cluster for testing: solana test validator. Fires up a fake Solana right on your machine. Fees? Near zero, like ~0.000005 SOL per tx. Test everything there first.
anchor init my_projectcd my_projectanchor build - spits out your program binaryanchor test - runs your tests on localnetSuper short, right? But devs mess this up by deploying to mainnet without local tests. Don't be that guy.
So you're coding. Cool. But Solana ain't Ethereum- no Solidity safety nets. Programs are stateless, accounts hold the data. Entry point's always process_instruction. Thing is, attackers control the accounts passed in. Always validate.
I usually structure like this: Context struct with all accounts, then checks galore. Here's a snippet I copy paste everywhere:
#[derive(Accounts)]
pub struct MyInstruction<'info> { #[account(mut)] pub payer: Signer<'info>, #[account( init, payer = payer, space = 8 + 32 )] pub my_account: Account<'info, MyData>,
} pub fn handler(ctx: Context<MyInstruction>) -> Result<()> { // Your logic here Ok(())
}
See that Signer? Forces it. No signer check? Dead program.
Account confusion's another killer. Deserializing wrong data type? Crash or worse, exploit. Fix: Use Anchor's account traits. Checks ownership, data init, all automatic.
require!(ctx.accounts.user.is_signer, ErrorCode::Unauthorized);requirekeyseq!(target.(), expected_program::ID);findprogramaddress and check bump seeds.Sound familiar? Every audit I've seen hits these. In my experience, run anchor test --skip local validator on devnet too. Catches network weirdness.
Alpenglow bumped blocks to 60M compute units. Means fancier DEX logic- RFQ routing, concentrated liquidity- no congestion. But fees? Still tiny, ~0.000005 SOL base + priority you set. Don't overpay; front ends jack priority fees now, screwing retail. Watch for that in 2026 with Firedancer pushing 100k TPS.
Okay, common mistake: Building for old Solana. Now, design mobile first. Seeker phone's out, 150+ units shipping. Gasless swaps via sponsors, lightweight UIs. I usually integrate Phantom or Backpack wallets early.
| Old Way (Pre-2026) | New Way (Alpenglow+) |
|---|---|
| Basic AMM pools like Raydium | CLMM + RFQ for tighter spreads |
| Desktop only UIs | Mobile native, gasless |
| No anti rug | Reputation scoring, bot blocks |
| High slippage on HFT | 100-150ms finality |
Pretty much sums it up. Why chase legacy? Siphon volume with smarter routing.
But testing. Everyone sucks at first. Write unit tests in Rust, then integration on testnet. Anchor's got #[test] macros- mock accounts easy.
programtest().start().withcontext()Potential issue: Local validator lags on complex logic. Solution? Helius or QuickNode RPC for devnet tests. Free tiers rock.
Deploy flow: anchor deploy --provider.cluster devnet. Then mainnet when audited. Fees for deploy? ~0.01 SOL first time, upgrades cheaper.
Now, compute units. Solana caps at 1.4M per tx post upgrades, but aim low. Why? Cheaper, faster. I usually profile with solana program show --compute units.
Short tip: Use Anchor's zero copy deserialization for big accounts. Drops compute 50% easy. In my experience, unoptimized code hits limits on mainnet bursts.
Building a DEX? Don't half ass security. Rug pulls? Anti bot: Rate limits per wallet, fair launch locks. Wash trading? Track volume patterns, score reps.
Steps for a basic swap program:
Issue: Slippage on big trades. Fix with CLMM-concentrated positions. Post Alpenglow, handles HFT smooth. Mobile? Webview swaps, no gas prompts.
Position for instos: RWA integrations, RFQ for big orders. Solana's at 40% DApp revenue now-ride that wave.
Your program's useless without a frontend. Use @solana/web3.js.
import { Connection, PublicKey, Transaction } from '@solana/web3.js';
const connection = new Connection('https://api.devnet.solana.com');
const tx = new Transaction().add(yourInstruction);
const sig = await sendTransaction(tx, connection);
Common pitfall: Not handling priority fees. 2026 problem-frontends extract via hidden prio. Solution: Let users set, or use Jito bundles for bundles.
Wallets: Phantom connect, signAllTransactions for batches. Test on mobile early.
Deployed? Audit first. Tools like Sec3 or Cantina scan for those 6 big vulns: signer misses, PDAs, etc. Cost? 5-20k USD, worth it.
Monitor with Helius dashboards-tx fails, compute spikes. Upgrades? Buffer program for immutable, or make mutable but gate with admin PDA.
Last thing: Community. Solana hackathons like Hyperdrive-900+ projects last year. 70% dev retention? Jump in, grants flow.
2026's mobile explosion. Build for Seeker-lightweight clients. LSTs like Sanctum for yields. PFOF incoming, so apps with user aligned fees win.
Multiple leaders proposing blocks? Cuts ordering games. Your apps? Diversify revenue, build super apps.